Research article critique

However, this abstract does not at any time discuss the qualitative approach used in this study, or make reference to ontological framework or any influencing models or theories (Silverman, 2001 p. 85).The discussion included in this article is very interesting, particularly to the non-Chinese reader.Have a strict deadline and no time to work on your article critique.Psychology students are often asked to write a critique paper evaluating a book, theory, or journal article.Our experts in custom writing will save your time and make it for you with pleasure.They have used the Social Support Questionniare, the Symptom Experience Questionnaire, the Self-Care Strategies Questionnaire, and the Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (Tangkawanich et al, 2008 p. 217). These are described in detail, and where they are based on previously developed research or derived directly from previous studies, this is also described.

This would then help the reader to identify if this is the type of research study that would be applicable to their own practice or learning.The authors do not state a hypothesis (Cormack, 2000), as such, but instead present a research question.

The sample size is described, but no details are given of how the participants were recruited, which does not allow the reader to evaluate this process and its appropriateness.

Critiquing a research article - ScienceDirect

Begin by looking at the title, abstract, introduction, headings, opening sentences of each paragraph, and the conclusion.The results of this study are presented in tables, diagrams, and in great detail within the text of the paper.

How do I write a good psychology article critique

This was a very in-depth research project, particularly for a journal article.The abstract then summarises the sample, data collection method and method of analysis, followed by the results and an evaluation of the findings and their implication for practice.Such models are developed over time in relation to standardised conceptualisations of what constitutes quality and rigour in research and in its reporting.We also offer our clients a lot of advantages such as on-time delivery, fair money back warranties, unlimited revisions, 100% originality without plagiarism.The author has noted that this is often the case in the reporting of such studies, but this may simply be a convention of the publication itself, and not the preference of the authors of the study.Do: capture the main points of each section, as space allows.

You are using them to support the argument or your critique of the article.Nursing: Research and Reviews 2013:3 written quantitative article critique may be structured as a guide for a future critique.Think about what the author does well, good points she makes, and insightful observations.Pang et al (2009 p. 315) show that nurses in China were entrenched in positive ideologies and that nursing values relate closely to the identified themes.

PSYC300 Research Article Critique - Running head RESEARCH

Our specialists provide professional assistance for writing article critiques on any topic.

If you want to get an article critique, you have come to the right place.It is not enough to cite previous research as a means of establishing the credentials of the study, as it were.For example, you might address a particular strength in the first sentence of the opinion section, followed by several sentences elaborating on the significance of the point.

Research Critique of Quantitative Research on Nursing Practice.This assignment is based on a social work research article you have chosen in an area of interest.Think about things you have discussed in class or other articles you have read.All are registered nurses, and four out of the five have doctoral qualifications, while the fifth has a masters level qualification.

Article Critique Guidelines

Checklist for reading and critiquing a research article. 1. Critiquing the research article a.Research quality: Critique of Journal of Counseling and Development By: Kelly L. Wester, L.

However, the only recommendation for future research is that it should be longitudinal rather than cross-sectional (Tangkawanich et al, 2008 p. 217).The article will be reviewed using the Cormack (2000) framework for evaluation of primary research articles, and will draw on other published research on qualitative methodologies to evaluate the article and its importance for nursing knowledge and practice.Cormack (2000) suggests that people appraising research question whether operational definitions are clearly presented.Use a topic sentence and supportive arguments for each opinion.Understanding the main points and arguments of the article is essential for an accurate summation.

However, it does not indicate in this title the nature of the study.Collection of guidelines and hints for different kind of papers on

Disclaimer: offers professional academic assistance.Critiquing a Research Article MAUREEN GIUFFRE, VhD, RN It is often the assignment of the perianesthesia nurse to critique a research article to evaluate a suggested.Using models or other graphical representations of thematic findings can enhance accessibility.More transparency could have been achieved by including an explanation of these tests.

Sample selection is not discussed in any detail, which could be a weakness of the study, as mentioned above (Cormack, 2000).The authors do identify terms used in relation to nursing values, and to the Chinese context, but this author would argue that there is not enough exploration of operational definitions, particularly in relation to the methodological approach which has been used.Teachers often assign article reviews to introduce students to the work of experts in the field.We invite you to try our world-class service and to order your Article Critique right now at the best price.